Happy to participate in a CSIS online event for a discussion on the implications of the NATO summit organised earlier this month in Ankara,Turkiye. Former PM of Netherlands,Mr. Mark Rutte has been leading NATO as the Secretary General for an year now and at Ankara he presented his vision for “NATO 3.0”[1-2]
In his speech he highlighted NATO moving away from ‘planning’ to ‘implementation’ and his idea of NATO 3.0 was appealing because of his focus on ‘military-industrialisation’ rather than straightforward and frankly overly simplistic arms procurement deals. Clearly Secretary General Rutte has given a lot of thought to the problem of making the defense industry more sustainable and his vision seems to align with my own ideas which I applied to the space industry [3-4].
Both space and defense are funded by tax collection and neither of these industries have demonstrated the ability to sustain themselves economically if that funding dried up. Space in particular is extremely fragile to these shocks and even its positioning as a telecommunications entity has led to limited economic success. I don't think that space communication can in any way compete with land based and wireless communication. Especially as the lifetime of orbiting or stationary satellites is limited and it has to be decommissioned destroying every equipment that's on board making it not only expensive but also wasteful.
Most governments however do not see a problem with this as both defense and space are considered to be ‘public’ sectors but this attitude stunts the growth of these industries because they lack incentives to innovate and find success in the marketplace. Many of the biggest names in the defense today are private corporations and there is a good reason for that.
But economics aside, this summit was political in nature. Within the alliance the US has raised objections to EU counterparts not spending their fair share of money to fund the defense forces and within the EU there is an increasing call for self reliance as they wish to become politically and militarily independent of the USA.
This is a tough problem but Secretary General Rutte handled it well, enabling procurement via EU manufacturers including Turkiye while allowing high end sales from US manufacturers too.
Russia and China were identified as threats to EU security. Given the rhetoric this was unsurprising but reality is far more complicated. Just last year Pres Putin and Pres Trump had a much publicised high profile meeting in Alaska which frankly defied all expectations.
This theme was repeated with China very recently as President Trump and President Xi had a fruitful ,thoughtful discussion just months ago. [5-6]
The message is clear that while think tanks like CSIS and the Atlantic council continue to push for conflict, at the highest level of leadership there is warmth and an intention to co-operate despite the events that exert their own powerful influence. Furthermore it is important to remember that many of these think tanks are not impartial in their opinions as their staff often consists of members of the deep state and private corporations whose objectives don't align with the opinion of the majority. It's best to ignore them completely.
This however does not mean that all allies are investing their energy in genuinely maintaining goodwill with the USA. Take Japan for example, who under the dubious leadership of Takaichi has refused to lend support for a peace keeping mission in the ME citing some obscure constitutional clause as a justification [8-9].
These legal loopholes however don't conceal the fact that there are entities that are taking advantage of the USA & refusing to offer any cooperation. Singapore is one such nation that is constantly trying to weaken US influence in South East Asia. It's not surprising it was slapped with tariffs by the White House[7].
However these are stop gap measures that will do little to address the underlying problem : that the USA is trying to force an alliance with nations that don't want a respectful partnership. From a geopolitical point of view this makes sense but there are better partners who are more receptive. The Philippines ,Kingdom of Brunei and Timor Leste in SEA could offer a stable long term alliance for the USA to exert influence. The greatest untapped opportunity however lies ,as it always has for the last 2000 years,with the African continent. The USA has an advantage here due to its extremely powerful and Influential African American diaspora.
It's time for NATO to expand strategically and create a security framework that can enable potential partners in Africa to participate in peace keeping missions. Secretary General Mark Rutte during his tenure as the PM of the Netherlands emphasized a pro African foreign policy, leading to fruitful and enduring partnerships. I believe he is the right person to achieve this grand vision.
REFERENCES
1 Rutte Declares “NATO 3.0” in Ankara: Europe Rearms, Ukraine Support Continues and Iran Warning Grows
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YirXtpIafv0&pp=0gcJCWQCo7VqN5tD
2 Atlantic Council Front Page Conversation with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte
https://www.nato.int/en/news-and-events/events/transcripts/2026/06/25/atlantic-council-front-page-conversation-with-nato-secretary-general-mark-rutte
3 Panel discussion on USA's deep space engg excellence
https://akshatjiwannotes.blogspot.com/2026/06/panel-discussion-on-usas-deep-space.html
4 Europe’s Space Strategy: Between Security and Commercial Reality
https://akshatjiwannotes.blogspot.com/2026/06/europes-space-strategy-between-security.html
5 President Donald Trump meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin at Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska
https://www.whitehouse.gov/gallery/president-donald-trump-meets-with-russian-president-vladimir-putin-at-joint-base-elmendorf-richardson-in-anchorage-alaska/
6 Readout of President Trump’s Meeting With Chinese President Xi Jinping
https://china.usembassy-china.org.cn/readout-of-president-trumps-meeting-with-chinese-president-xi-jinping/
7 US hits Singapore with 12.5% tariffs, citing failure to ban imports produced with forced labour
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/us-tariffs-singapore-trade-mti-forced-labour-6275051
8 Japan Won’t Send Forces to Help With Mine-Removal in Strait
https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/us-israel-iran-war-2026/card/japan-won-t-send-forces-to-help-with-mine-removal-in-strait-fvUqfhYi5Opp6xItlNQY
9 Iran ready to open Hormuz to Japanese vessels, as the US deploys more troops
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/khamenei-defiant-as-the-us-deploys-more-troops-in-middle-east/udkvb08ac
Comments
Post a Comment