Skip to main content

Where does the energy go when two EM waves interfere?

 


In radio engineering it's well known that interference reduces the strength of the signal. 


With respect to interference we talk about things like constructive and destructive interference. In constructive interference signals are in phase and reinforce each other. 


In destructive interference signals are out of phase and cancel each other. 

But when we talk in terms of energy, when we consider electromagnetic waves as propagating energy sources a different question arises

How does interference affect the energy of the wave,if it does at all? 


Now it's quite obvious that unlike signals that can lose information energy can't be "lost". However energy can be transformed as well as transferred.  In that case does the transfer of energy happens within the wave or between the interfering waves. 


Or to put it another way does the wave that carries energy lose it to another in case of destructive interference and gain it from another in case of constructive interference?


This understanding is of great importance in wireless energy transmission systems. 


An electromagnetic wave consists of electric and magnetic components. The transformation of energy happens within these components  


As shown in this paper by Kirk T MacDonald of Princeton University


http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/destructive.pdf


A destructive interference in EM waves doubles the electric energy but destroys the magnetic energy of the wave. 


A constructive interference doubles the magnetic energy but destroys the electric energy of the wave. 


In both cases the total energy of the wave remains constant or conserved.  

Effect of transformation on signal 

We know that information is encoded in the electric field by a modulating current at the transmitter. At the receivers end this electric field produces a current that is demodulated. 


Now if we apply these observations to signal theory in radio engineering we find that  since in destructive interference the electric component is modified so is the information. 


But the loss of Information does not mean loss of energy. As noted, the wave energy is conserved in magnetic/electric fields. 

The electrical nature of the EM wave 

In EM waves there is no electric charge. Just like you can't get shocked by sunlight you also can't get shocked by a radio wave. 

But just as you can get burned by intense sunlight you can also get burned by radio waves,if the intensity is high enough. 


https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/19633


A question arises then ,if there is no electricity in EM waves then what is the E component in EM.


Relationship between electric field and electric charge


That E in EM refers to an electric field. We know that a static Electric field is a force. A moving electric field,such as the one in a propagating wave is energy. 


More explanation...


It is common knowledge that electric charges create fields. Static charges create static field and moving charges create moving field. This is a well understood principle. 


But electric charges are not the only things that create and electric field. A changing magnetic field can also create an electric field. This electric field will affect electric charge but they are not composed of it. 


In other words the electric field is not the cause of the electric charge but the effect.


 An electric charge has an electric field. A moving magnetic field also has an electric field but without electric charge. 


This is the fundamental principle of EM wave propagation where electric and magnetic fields feed off each other. 


EM waves are pure energy that can be converted into other forms of energy like heat,or wind or electricity. We're already familiar with the conversion process as in converting sunlight to electricity, or sunlight to heat etc.  


Since energy cannot be destroyed all interference does is change one form of EM energy into another. 

From the point of view of wireless transmission of energy the presence of other EM waves will not destroy the energy of the transmitting wave. 



About superposition that still applies but since in EM waves the direction of propagation is a cross product of E and M it is possible for interfering waves to combine their Es and conserve energy. Or Ms for that matter depending upon the direction


Here's the answer by Prof Hanz that explains it well with diagrams as well as with a link to his paper. It's a good read and I encourage you to check it out.


https://www.quora.com/When-2-waves-interfere-destructively-what-happens-to-the-energy-of-the-waves/answer/Hans-Schantz?ch=10&share=b1d03315&srid=LNunv


There's a lot we can learn from EM waves that can help us in the future for energy conservation, generation as well as transmission. This is an area of research that should be picked by universities.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Low energy fabrication of a high strength layered ceramic composite for high temperature oxidative environments

High temperature materials are required in various applications: in metallurgy, for making combustion chambers of internal combustion engines ,for the body of Stirling engines, for wall material of nuclear fusion reactors, for the body of Jet engines among a few.  For such applications we need materials that can retain their strengths at elevated temperatures and can survive in an oxidative environment  It is the second requirement which is more stringent. Although numerous metallic alloys have been synthesized that can sustain both high temperatures and oxygen attack they require complex processing steps  On the other hand ceramics are good at resisting both oxygen attacks and high temperatures and are relatively simpler to fabricate but are limited by massive amounts of energy required. For example c/sic composites will perform well in demanding high temperature oxidative environments but require vacuum to be manufactured. The acheson process for the formation of sic is...

Force calculations on electron in vacuum tubes

ABSTRACT A claim was made in the paper titled “Do electrons really flow as a beam in cathode ray tubes? ” where we asserted that electrons remain near the cathode surface during the operation of CRT. Here we do force calculations on electrons by estimating the debye length of electrons emitted after thermionic emission and show that under given applied voltages if electrons are placed at debye length they are sufficiently far away from the cathode surface to be accelerated towards it.  Debye length, while typically used to measure charge screening distance in plasmas and electrolytes, can also be used to estimate the distance of emitted electrons from the cathode surface.  In the same way debye length is used to calculate the thickness of an electrical double layer in which the surface charge and charge on inner helmholtz plane are immobile & the charges on outer helmholtz plane are mobile we can model emitted electrons as mobile charges & image charges distribute...

Manufacturing technique for layered carbon /ceramic composite for use in high temperature oxidative environment

We previously described a layered carbon glass material system that is different from c/sic , c/sio2 matrix composites in that it consists of a distinct C/C phase which is coated by an sio2 layer.  https://akshatjiwannotes.blogspot.com/2024/12/low-energy-fabrication-of-high-strength.html This material system presents a distinct advantage in a high temperature oxidative atmosphere as the C/C matrix is protected by the oxidation resistant glass shield. Such a material can supposedly be synthesized in an open oxidative atmosphere. In this short note we will answer some questions such as  What manufacturing technique will be used?  How can silica particles be sintered on the substrate? How can adhesion between sintered particles and carbon substrate be ensured? What, if any ,sintering aids will be used? What would be the mechanical properties of the composite so formed?  What level of heat treatment will be required? To make the composite only the minimum amount of heat ...

Do electrons really flow as a beam in cathode ray tubes?

  Abstract: It is generally well accepted that a beam of electrons flow from cathode to anode in a cathode ray tube. Taking pressure  data from a variety of sources from CRT manufacturers’  data sheets to engineering documents of large hadron colliders we show through calculations that there is enough residual gas in these devices to form a conducting path from anode to cathode due to plasma formation. When high voltages are applied at the anode the gas is ionized and becomes a plasma forming a ‘wire’ between the two electrodes that causes conduction of energy.  The objective of this brief note is to encourage scientists and engineers to re-investigate commonly accepted beliefs about vacuum tubes and develop new knowledge that can revitalize the field especially at a time when nano scaled vacuum channel transistors are being envisioned.  Most vacuum tubes have  operating pressures in the ultra high vacuum range. This is true for cathode ray tubes, vacuum tu...

Unlocking the Potential of Carbon for Long-Distance Electrical Transmission

ABSTRACT: We present a technique to manufacture large scale carbon based conductors for transmission of electrical energy over continental scale distances. We start by identifying precursors that could be used for production processes.We review the current manufacturing techniques of producing carbon based fibers and explain why certain precursors have dominated carbon materials industry. We identify methods that can be used to increase the yield through alternative precursors.We put forward a theory of why carbon conductors have less conductivity than metals and what can be done to improve it. Finally we postulate that with cheaper production methods even if carbon based conductors are 10 times less effective than poor metallic conductors like steel, they can still outperform them in High Voltage transmission lines if cheap manufacturing techniques could be developed.  INTRODUCTION: Copper and in certain very specific applications aluminium & silicon steels dominate when it co...

What's with all the H1B ruckus?

The US policy makers are facing some tough choices as there's now an increased competition for talent from places like Europe,Australia,canada and even from asian nations like south korea , singapore ,saudi arabia ,UAE etc.  While I'm all for protecting domestic jobs there's the danger that USA may face significant competition in the coming decades from the nations that are eager to hire talented immigrants to build their industry.  The solution I think is to take lead in key industries to continue the growth. US did well initially with electric vehicles but it lost advantage. It has a lot going for it in AI and Google's quantum supremacy is promising for US deep tech. In semiconductors the chips and science act did well to promote local industries.  US still has one of the largest fiber optic cable manufacturers. It's telecom industry is doing reasonably well. Boeing  suffered some setbacks but other aviation components manufacturers like GE  are doing well. Th...

Doping strategy for all carbon materials

The challange 1. Carbon is a very small atom. With an atomic number of 6, there are only 5 other atoms that are smaller than carbon. Compared to silicon with an atomic number of 14 the doping choices are minimal. Unlike silicon, elemental carbon can't be melt processed so existing tools & understanding about dopants (or more generally alloying) are out.  2. Carbon has a very rich chemistry. Elements like hydrogen & nitrogen that would become good candidates for doping actually form covalent bonds with carbon[1]. And instead of providing electron-hole pairs, the band gap continuously. Compare this with boron & phosphorus in silicon where they act more or less in their free atomic state. Sure with careful engineering maybe hydrogen & nitrogen can be made to fit inside carbon lattice (nitrogen happily sits inside diamond for example & it would be expected that it would act as a dopant in diamond like carbon as well)  3. The crystal arrangements of carbon that ...

Powerful permanent magnets with easily available materials

  #engineering #magnets Magnets are critical to energy infrastructure today. They are used in generators (coal,hydroelectric,wind) ,motors in electric vehicles,mechanical pumps etc. Most magnets today use nickel,cobalt,neodymium, Strontium etc. These materials are hard to find, extract & purify. For a renewable energy future it is extremely important to make magnets from easily available materials. Latest research has shown that permanent magnets can be made from abundant materials : iron,carbon,silicon & nitrogen Iron nitride has already been demonstrated as the most powerful magnet ever synthesized but nitriding can be a little complicated. https://phys.org/news/2010-03-iron-nitrogen-compound-strongest-magnet.html https://magnairon.com/technology/niron-2/ Reasonably powerful magntes can be created with composites of iron,carbon and silicon. These elements are much easier to work with. https://journals.aps.org/prapplied/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.024012 https://www...

Optical properties of carbon allotropes

   1. Single atom spectrum If we consider carbon as a single atom then it emits all over the visible light spectrum. There are emission lines in red,yellow,green,blue indigo & violet colors. With carbon there's a complete rainbow of colors. By applying corresponding energies(electrical,heat,mechanical it doesn't really matter what kind of energy)specific color lines would be obtainable in carbon.  2. Graphite vs diamond vs diamond like carbon Practically speaking however we don't really find one atom of carbon floating around displaying its vivid colors. Carbon atoms arrange themselves into a dark black graphitic form or a transparent diamond form. Already we have two extremes of optical properties in a single element.  But there's also diamond like carbon. In this form due to functionalization the bond angles of hetero atom-decorated carbon starts to look like that of sp3 diamond. Consequently its properties tend to shift towards diamond as well. It becomes opti...

Which book will help me to make my own wireless network?

  Wireless networking is one of those things that is easier to do in practice than it is to learn in theory. You will learn more by jumping in right ahead rather than poring through the books. But if you’re an absolute beginner you need to start somewhere. So I’ll give an overview of the practical aspects of wireless networks first and towards the end of my answer I’ll give suggestions from where you can learn the theory. All wireless networks have three basic components Antennas that send out wireless signals A hardware that provides input signal to the antennas which it sends out wirelessly An operating system that controls the hardware, which sends the input signals to antennas, which then sends it out wirelessly. Now if you look at something as basic as a wifi router you’ll note that it has Antennas (either external or on chip) A chip to which those antennas are connected An OS (that is accessible through the web admin panel) that controls the chip So as a start you should try ...