Skip to main content

Force calculations on electron in vacuum tubes

ABSTRACT

A claim was made in the paper titled “Do electrons really flow as a beam in cathode ray tubes? ” where we asserted that electrons remain near the cathode surface during the operation of CRT. Here we do force calculations on electrons by estimating the debye length of electrons emitted after thermionic emission and show that under given applied voltages if electrons are placed at debye length they are sufficiently far away from the cathode surface to be accelerated towards it.

Debye length, while typically used to measure charge screening distance in plasmas and electrolytes, can also be used to estimate the distance of emitted electrons from the cathode surface.

In the same way debye length is used to calculate the thickness of an electrical double layer in which the surface charge and charge on inner helmholtz plane are immobile & the charges on outer helmholtz plane are mobile we can model emitted electrons as mobile charges & image charges distributed on the cathode surface as immobile.

The debye length indicates the maximum distance beyond which the electric field is reduced. Once we have that length we can apply Coulomb's law to calculate the force between charges. Then we can compare it with the force exerted by the electric field on the anode.

To calculate debye length we need number density of electrons and for that we need current density in current per meter square and electron velocity.


Electron velocity can be calculated by applying the energy equivalence principle.

The energy gained by an electron under an applied voltage V is given by


E=eV


Where:

E is the energy acquired by the electron (in joules),

e is the charge of the electron, which is approximately 1.602×10^−19 C

V is the applied voltage (in volts).

The velocity gained by electron in the vacuum tube when a potential difference V is applied can simply be calculated by energy equivalence

1/2mv^2=eV

v = √((2 * e * V )/ (m)

Now cathode ray tubes typically use voltages between 20-40Kv. Taking 40 Kv in our example we find velocity to be

v-crt= √(2 * (1.602 x 10^-19 C) * (40,000 V) / (9.109 x 10^-31 kg)

v-crt ≈ 1.19×10^8 m/s

vacuum tubes on the other hand have anode voltages that vary depending upon their specific use case. Here's a typical example

https://www.eierc.com/rc/ECC82.htm


Taking the value of v as 250 V we get electron velocity


v-vacuum=9.377366 ×10^6 m/s


[It's clear that as the applied voltage decreases the velocity of electrons decreases too]


From this velocity we can calculate electron density using the relation

n=J/ev

Where:

J is the current density (in amperes per square meter, A/m²),

n is the electron density (in electrons per cubic meter, e/m³),

e is the elementary charge (1.602×10^−19 C)


v is the drift velocity of electrons (in meters per second, m/s).


Let's calculate electron density for hot cathode current values for tungsten at 1273K and 2500k from this page


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_cathode


Current Density (J): 500 mA/cm² = 500 * 10^-3 A / (10^-2 m)² = 5 * 10^1 A/m²


n-crt=50/(1.602×10^−19)×(1.19×10^8)

n-crt ≈ 2.62×10^12electrons/m3

now we calculate number of electrons in vacuum tube

n-vaccum=3.33×10 ^13 electrons/m 3

[So a smaller electron velocity due to a lesser applied voltage produces an increased density of electrons]

To compare

Here are some typical electron density ranges for cathode ray tubes (CRTs) and vacuum tubes:

Cathode Ray Tubes (CRTs)

- *Typical electron density:* 10^13 - 10^15 m^(-3)

Vacuum Tubes

- *Triodes:* 10^14 - 10^16 m^(-3)

- *Tetrodes:* 10^15 - 10^17 m^(-3)

- *Pentodes:* 10^16 - 10^18 m^(-3)

- *Beam power tubes:* 10^17 - 10^19 m^(-3)

These values were obtained from chatgpt and meta AI search

The formula for debye length is

λD = √(ε₀kT) / √(q^2n)

where:

λD is the Debye length

ε₀ is the permittivity of free space

k is Boltzmann's constant

T is the temperature of the plasma

q is the charge of the particles

n is the number density of the particles

Here we are going to assume that electron temperature is same as the surface temperature of hot filament

Debye length for electrons in CRT ,

λcrt=1.52×10^−3 m

Debye length for electrons in vacuum tube

λvacuum=6.0×10^−4m


These numbers agree well with debye length in plasmas at comparable densities.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debye_length

Total charge enclosed in a sphere of radius λcrt/2 ,Qcrt=2.45×10^−16

Total charge enclosed in a sphere of radius λvacuum/2 ,Qvacuum=5.98×10^−16C

Force between Qvacuum and it's image charge on cathode is Feivacuum=2.34×10^-16 N

Force on Qvacuum due to applied voltage 250 volt on anode at 𝑑=0.0394m


𝐹eavacuum≈2.39×10−11

Feavacuum>>>Feivacuum

Force between Qcrt and it's image charge separated by debye length in CRT is Feicrt=8.95×10^-15N

Force on Q crt due to applied voltage of 40Kv on anode at .0362m Feacrt=4.17×10^-9N

Again Feacrt>>>Feicrt

In both cases the force due to applied electric field at anode is much larger than the force on emitted electron due to the applied charge


CONCLUSION

The results show that in both vacuum tubes and cathode ray tubes the force exerted by the image charge on the cathode upon the emitted electrons is far smaller than the force exerted by the applied voltage at the anode. The force between emitted electron and its image charge was calculated at a distance of debye length which is the maximum distance at which the electric field of the positive charges in cathode are screened.

This results proves that the electrons will be accelerated towards anode and the previous assertion that electrons stay near the cathode surface is false.

However, since a significant amount of air molecules (45.24×10^7 molecules at 100 nano pascal)exist between cathode and anode these electrons collide with them and result in ionization of the gas and creation of a plasma between the cathode and anode that becomes conductive and carries electrical energy.

While the results explain how energy is conducted in existing vacuum tubes it would be interesting to conduct an experiment that operates at even lower pressures 10 or even 1 nano Pascal. At these pressure ranges the number of air molecules would be significantly reduced and there should be no plasma formed. How would the vacuum tube behave then?

[However a challenge remains with reported values of electron densities in literature. These values would shorten the debye lengths and thus increase the attractive force between cathode and anode charges.Also we used lowest current densities. Cathodes with very high current densities are available that would affect calculations. Also while debye length gives maximum distance beyond which electric fields are screened it doesn't necessarily give the distance that the two charge carriers are at from each other.]

There is still much that remains unanswered about cathode rays and we encourage more research on the subject.

To prove that cathode rays do flow & carry energy, careful experiments need to be conducted that exactly measure the pressure inside vacuum tubes & then lower it to a value that would ensure that no plasma is formed between anode and cathode inside the tube. For that it is essential to lower the vacuum tube pressure to less than 10 nano Pascal.

Further reading

https://akshatjiwannotes.blogspot.com/2024/12/do-electrons-really-flow-as-beam-in.html

https://www.reddit.com/r/ElectricalEngineering/comments/1hldmqg/is_there_any_way_to_determine_distance_of_ejected/



Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Low energy fabrication of a high strength layered ceramic composite for high temperature oxidative environments

High temperature materials are required in various applications: in metallurgy, for making combustion chambers of internal combustion engines ,for the body of Stirling engines, for wall material of nuclear fusion reactors, for the body of Jet engines among a few.  For such applications we need materials that can retain their strengths at elevated temperatures and can survive in an oxidative environment  It is the second requirement which is more stringent. Although numerous metallic alloys have been synthesized that can sustain both high temperatures and oxygen attack they require complex processing steps  On the other hand ceramics are good at resisting both oxygen attacks and high temperatures and are relatively simpler to fabricate but are limited by massive amounts of energy required. For example c/sic composites will perform well in demanding high temperature oxidative environments but require vacuum to be manufactured. The acheson process for the formation of sic is...
Post a Comment
Read more

Unlocking the Potential of Carbon for Long-Distance Electrical Transmission

ABSTRACT: We present a technique to manufacture large scale carbon based conductors for transmission of electrical energy over continental scale distances. We start by identifying precursors that could be used for production processes.We review the current manufacturing techniques of producing carbon based fibers and explain why certain precursors have dominated carbon materials industry. We identify methods that can be used to increase the yield through alternative precursors.We put forward a theory of why carbon conductors have less conductivity than metals and what can be done to improve it. Finally we postulate that with cheaper production methods even if carbon based conductors are 10 times less effective than poor metallic conductors like steel, they can still outperform them in High Voltage transmission lines if cheap manufacturing techniques could be developed.  INTRODUCTION: Copper and in certain very specific applications aluminium & silicon steels dominate when it co...
Post a Comment
Read more

Do electrons really flow as a beam in cathode ray tubes?

  Abstract: It is generally well accepted that a beam of electrons flow from cathode to anode in a cathode ray tube. Taking pressure  data from a variety of sources from CRT manufacturers’  data sheets to engineering documents of large hadron colliders we show through calculations that there is enough residual gas in these devices to form a conducting path from anode to cathode due to plasma formation. When high voltages are applied at the anode the gas is ionized and becomes a plasma forming a ‘wire’ between the two electrodes that causes conduction of energy.  The objective of this brief note is to encourage scientists and engineers to re-investigate commonly accepted beliefs about vacuum tubes and develop new knowledge that can revitalize the field especially at a time when nano scaled vacuum channel transistors are being envisioned.  Most vacuum tubes have  operating pressures in the ultra high vacuum range. This is true for cathode ray tubes, vacuum tu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Manufacturing technique for layered carbon /ceramic composite for use in high temperature oxidative environment

We previously described a layered carbon glass material system that is different from c/sic , c/sio2 matrix composites in that it consists of a distinct C/C phase which is coated by an sio2 layer.  https://akshatjiwannotes.blogspot.com/2024/12/low-energy-fabrication-of-high-strength.html This material system presents a distinct advantage in a high temperature oxidative atmosphere as the C/C matrix is protected by the oxidation resistant glass shield. Such a material can supposedly be synthesized in an open oxidative atmosphere. In this short note we will answer some questions such as  What manufacturing technique will be used?  How can silica particles be sintered on the substrate? How can adhesion between sintered particles and carbon substrate be ensured? What, if any ,sintering aids will be used? What would be the mechanical properties of the composite so formed?  What level of heat treatment will be required? To make the composite only the minimum amount of heat ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Electrostatic Machines in Power Engineering: Rethinking Their Role and Future Potential

ABSTRACT: Although electrostatic motors and generators have been among the first electrical machines developed they have not gained widespread adoption in power engineering.Except for very niche applications in micromotors the electrostatic machines have not done well.The electrostatic theory is overlooked & it's the electromagnetic counterparts that are intensely studied in educational institutes. In this paper we explore the reasons behind this fact & propose the design of an electrostatic generator that can compete with its magnetic analogue.  INTRODUCTION:  Forces due to electrostatic fields are extremely powerful. If a charge is moving at the speed of 1m/sec then the magnetic force due it is 3x10^8 times weaker than the electrostatic force.  This should have encouraged engineers & scientists to develop electrostatic motors & generators but it hides a very important point about electrostatic fields. At the magnetic saturation limit the electric field ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Engineering Design of a Stirling Engine Integrating High-Temperature Combustion and Low-Temperature Cryogenic Sources

Engineering Design of a Stirling Engine Integrating High-Temperature Combustion and Low-Temperature Cryogenic Sources ABSTRACT While Stirling engine analysis using the ideal adiabatic model improves upon the isothermal model by accounting for heat exchange between hot and cold spaces it comes at the cost of complexity requiring the designer to solve for 16 variables and 22 differential equations.  Higher order analysis increases the complexity further by using CFD to analyse the engine. None of these methods answer the basic questions about engine design.  In this technical report we develop a set of equations that can help design a Stirling engine from scratch by reverse engineering from the power input and calculating plate area,stroke length,piston velocity and frequency of the engine along with the temperature at the hot end. We use the results to calculate the working volume of the engine and the pressure and temperature at the hot side to drive the output.  INTRODUC...
Post a Comment
Read more

Doping strategy for all carbon materials

The challange 1. Carbon is a very small atom. With an atomic number of 6, there are only 5 other atoms that are smaller than carbon. Compared to silicon with an atomic number of 14 the doping choices are minimal. Unlike silicon, elemental carbon can't be melt processed so existing tools & understanding about dopants (or more generally alloying) are out.  2. Carbon has a very rich chemistry. Elements like hydrogen & nitrogen that would become good candidates for doping actually form covalent bonds with carbon[1]. And instead of providing electron-hole pairs, the band gap continuously. Compare this with boron & phosphorus in silicon where they act more or less in their free atomic state. Sure with careful engineering maybe hydrogen & nitrogen can be made to fit inside carbon lattice (nitrogen happily sits inside diamond for example & it would be expected that it would act as a dopant in diamond like carbon as well)  3. The crystal arrangements of carbon that ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What's with all the H1B ruckus?

The US policy makers are facing some tough choices as there's now an increased competition for talent from places like Europe,Australia,canada and even from asian nations like south korea , singapore ,saudi arabia ,UAE etc.  While I'm all for protecting domestic jobs there's the danger that USA may face significant competition in the coming decades from the nations that are eager to hire talented immigrants to build their industry.  The solution I think is to take lead in key industries to continue the growth. US did well initially with electric vehicles but it lost advantage. It has a lot going for it in AI and Google's quantum supremacy is promising for US deep tech. In semiconductors the chips and science act did well to promote local industries.  US still has one of the largest fiber optic cable manufacturers. It's telecom industry is doing reasonably well. Boeing  suffered some setbacks but other aviation components manufacturers like GE  are doing well. Th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nanotechnology or manufacturing ? Which one would I suggest and why?

You know one of the biggest problems in nanotechnology is actually manufacturing of nanomaterials.It turns out that breaking materials (chemically, mechanically or electrically) is not so easy. Neither is doing the opposite i.e bottom up synthesis.Making structural nanomaterials is prohibitively expensive. That is why no one is doing it.  I think integrated circuits are probably the biggest success story of nanotechnology. Everywhere else it is still very much a research topic. From the POV of getting a job manufacturing looks more appealing to me. I'm not familiar with the course topics but even in manufacturing you may need to specialise in some material system. Glass,steel,polymers , automation etc.  I think instead of choosing between academia or industry, balance it out. Understand the fundamentals of nanotech well enough that you can switch between promising career paths. For nanotech that is semiconductors ,quantum dots,electrospun fibers and maybe membranes. But rese...
Post a Comment
Read more